<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Review - Tag - The handbag of Cryptax</title><link>https://cryptax.github.io/tags/review/</link><description>Review - Tag - The handbag of Cryptax</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><managingEditor>crypto.maniak@gmail.com (Cryptax)</managingEditor><webMaster>crypto.maniak@gmail.com (Cryptax)</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://cryptax.github.io/tags/review/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Reviewing the AI-generated submissions with AI</title><link>https://cryptax.github.io/posts/reviewing-ai-generated-submissions-with-ai/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>cryptax</author><guid>https://cryptax.github.io/posts/reviewing-ai-generated-submissions-with-ai/</guid><description>Reviewing the AI-generated submissions with AI I am a reviewer for several conferences, and you won&amp;rsquo;t be surprised to hear we are getting an increasing number of AI-generated submissions with close to 0 technical value.
I don&amp;rsquo;t know yet if those are (1) pure spam, or (2) naive authors who hope to get selected.
Why should I spend human brains and time on something which was generated in seconds by AI?</description></item></channel></rss>